We’ve seen a lot of concept videos on this blog (including ones I’ve posted) but it’s nice to put some of it in perspective. John Gruber is usually a pretty big Apple avocate, so I tend to take a lot of his proclaimations with a grain of salt, but his thoughts on the types of companies that make concept videos seem pretty spot on:
I’m not arguing that making concept videos directly leads to a lack of traction in the current market. I’m arguing that making concept videos is a sign of a company that has a lack of institutional focus on the present and near-present. Can you imagine a sports team in the midst of a present-day losing season that makes a video imagining a future championship 10 years out?
The designs in these concept videos are free from real-world constraints — technical, logical, fiscal. Dealing with constraints is what real design is all about. Institutional attention on the present day — on getting innovative industry-leading products out the door and creating consumer demand for them — requires relentless company-wide focus.
It’s especially interesting when we note that a lot of the companies we see making the videos posted are not recently innovation leaders in their fields (e.g. Nokia, Microsoft with respect to UX, Google in the hardware space). Are these concept videos marketing stunts with no real innovation practices to back them up?
Forget the bipeds–now robots can murder you, even upstairs:
This is possibly old news, but the “LG Hom-Bot 2.0 Smart Robot Vacuum Cleaner” is a roomba-like vacuuming robot that has webcams built into it. You can log into these cameras via an iPhone or Android device. This is absolutely hilarious, but probably not worth the €500-700 that LG was expecting to charge for it.
Jan Chipchase, formerly Chief Usabilty Researcher at Nokia and now “Executive Creative Director of Global Insights” at Frog Design, has an interesting post up speculating about businesses using small-scale quadrotors to map houses as a commercial service:
Let the swarms fly!
I feel like I’m maybe getting too into BLDGBLOG, but this post seems really interesting in a smart home context, although maybe a little larger in scope. Along the theme of “Design of Environments” is this post considering “speculative geotextiles,” allowing sensing of presence, reconfigurable landscapes, containing hills that roll and move, or respond to natural disasters. Based on laying underground cables, these networks could be configured to produce hundreds of mile-long swaths of sensor networks. Evocative.
Laying sensor cable
I’m sorry to keep posting links to papers to read ;), but I just remembered an interesting article out of the sadly now-defunct Berkley Intel Research center. Alison Woodruff led an ethnographic study around home automation technology to support Sabbath practices for Orthodox Jews. It’s super interesting!
here’s an arXiv link to the paper:
Sabbath Day Home Automation: “It’s Like Mixing Technology and Religion”